Overview
Questions
Objectives
Keypoints
cat
displays the contents of its inputs.head
displays the first 10 lines of its input.tail
displays the last 10 lines of its input.sort
sorts its inputs.wc
counts lines, words, and characters in its inputs.command > file
redirects a command’s output to a file (overwriting any existing content).command >> file
appends a command’s output to a file.<
operator redirects input to a commandfirst | second
is a pipeline: the output of the first command is used as the input to the second.Now that we know a few basic commands, we can look at the shell’s most powerful feature: the ease with which it lets us combine existing programs in new ways. We’ll start with a directory called molecules
that contains six files describing
some simple organic molecules. The .pdb
extension indicates that these files are in Protein Data Bank format, a simple text format that specifies the type and position of each atom in the molecule.
Input:
$ ls molecules
Output:
cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb
octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
Let’s go into that directory with cd
and run the command wc *.pdb
. wc
is the “word count” command: it counts the number of lines, words, and characters in files (from left to right, in that order).
The *
in *.pdb
matches zero or more characters, so the shell turns *.pdb
into a list of all .pdb
files in the current directory:
Input:
$ cd molecules
$ wc *.pdb
Output:
20 156 1158 cubane.pdb
12 84 622 ethane.pdb
9 57 422 methane.pdb
30 246 1828 octane.pdb
21 165 1226 pentane.pdb
15 111 825 propane.pdb
107 819 6081 total
If we run wc -l
instead of just wc
, the output shows only the number of lines per file:
Input:
$ wc -l *.pdb
Output:
20 cubane.pdb
12 ethane.pdb
9 methane.pdb
30 octane.pdb
21 pentane.pdb
15 propane.pdb
107 total
Why Isn’t This Working?
What happens if a command is supposed to process a file, but we don’t give it a filename? For example, what if we type:
Input:
$ wc -l
but don’t type *.pdb
(or anything else) after the command? Since it doesn’t have any filenames, wc
assumes it is supposed to process input given at the command prompt, so it just sits there and waits for us to give it some data interactively. From the outside, though, all we see is it sitting there: the command doesn’t appear to do anything.
If you make this kind of mistake, you can escape out of this state by holding down the control key (Ctrl) and typing the letter C once and letting go of the Ctrl key. Ctrl+C
We can also use -w
to get only the number of words, or -c
to get only the number of characters.
Which of these files contains the fewest lines? It’s an easy question to answer when there are only six files, but what if there were 6000? Our first step toward a solution is to run the command:
Input:
$ wc -l *.pdb > lengths.txt
The >
symbol redirects command output to a file instead of displaying it on the screen. This explains the lack of screen output; everything that wc
would have printed goes into the lengths.txt
file. If the file doesn’t exist, the shell creates it. If it does, it’s silently overwritten, so be cautious. ls lengths.txt
confirms that the file exists:
Input:
$ ls lengths.txt
Output:
$ lengths.txt
We can now send the content of lengths.txt
to the screen using cat lengths.txt
. cat
stands for “concatenate”: it prints the contents of files one after another. There’s only one file in this case, so cat
just shows us what it contains:
Input:
$ cat lengths.txt
Output:
20 cubane.pdb
12 ethane.pdb
9 methane.pdb
30 octane.pdb
21 pentane.pdb
15 propane.pdb
107 total
We’ll use cat
in this lesson for convenience and consistency, but it has the disadvantage of dumping the whole file onto your screen. In practice, the more useful less
, which you use with less lengths.txt
. This displays a screenful of the file, and then stops. You can go forward one screenful by pressing the spacebar, or back one by pressing b
. Press q
to quit.
Now let’s use the sort
command to sort its contents.
We will use the -n
option to specify that the sort is numerical instead of alphanumerical. This does not change the file; instead, it sends the sorted result to the screen:
Input:
$ sort -n lengths.txt
Output:
9 methane.pdb
12 ethane.pdb
15 propane.pdb
20 cubane.pdb
21 pentane.pdb
30 octane.pdb
107 total
We can put the sorted list of lines in another temporary file called sorted-lengths.txt
by putting > sorted-lengths.txt
after the command, just as we used > lengths.txt
to put the output of wc
into lengths.txt
. Once we’ve done that, we can
run another command called head
to get the first few lines in sorted-lengths.txt
:
Input:
$ sort -n lengths.txt > sorted-lengths.txt
$ head -n 1 sorted-lengths.txt
Output:
9 methane.pdb
Using -n 1
with head
tells it that we only want the first line of the file; -n 20
would get the first 20, and so on. Since sorted-lengths.txt
contains the lengths of our files ordered from least to greatest, the output of head
must be the
file with the fewest lines.
Redirecting to the same file
It’s a very bad idea to try redirecting the output of a command that operates on a file to the same file. For example:
$ sort -n lengths.txt lengths.txt
Doing something like this may give you incorrect results and/or delete the contents of lengths.txt
.
>>
Mean?We have seen the use of >
, but there is a similar operator >>
which works slightly differently. We’ll learn about the differences between these two operators by printing some strings. We can use the echo
command to print strings e.g.
Input:
$ echo The echo command prints text
Output:
The echo command prints text
Exercise: echo
Now test the commands below to reveal the difference between the two operators:
Input:
$ echo hello > testfile01.txt
and
Input:
$ echo hello >> testfile02.txt
Hint: Try executing each command twice in a row and then examining the output files.
In the first example with the string “hello” is written to ‘testfile01.txt’, but the file gets overwritten each time we run the command.
We see from the second example that the ‘»’ operator also writes “hello” to a file (in this case ‘testfile02.txt’), but appends the string to the file if it already exists (i.e. when we run it for the second time).
We have already met the head
command, which prints lines from the start of a file. tail
is similar, but prints lines from the end of a file instead.
Exercise: tail
Consider the file data-shell/data/animals.txt
. After these commands, select the answer that corresponds to the file animals-subset.txt
:
$ head -n 3 animals.txt > animals-subset.txt
$ tail -n 2 animals.txt >> animals-subset.txt
animals.txt
animals.txt
animals.txt
animals.txt
Option 3 is correct.
head -n 3 animals.txt | tail -n 2 animals-subset.txt
If you think this is confusing, you’re in good company: even once you understand what wc
, sort
, and head
do, all those intermediate files make it hard to follow what’s going on. We can make it easier to understand by running sort
and head
together:
Input:
$ sort -n lengths.txt | head -n 1
Output:
9 methane.pdb
The vertical bar, |
, between the two commands is called a pipe. It tells the shell that we want to use the output of the command on the left as the input to the command on the right.
Nothing prevents us from chaining pipes consecutively. That is, we can for example send the output of wc
directly to sort
, and then the resulting output to head
. Thus we first use a pipe to send the output of wc
to sort
:
Input:
$ wc -l *.pdb | sort -n
Output:
9 methane.pdb
12 ethane.pdb
15 propane.pdb
20 cubane.pdb
21 pentane.pdb
30 octane.pdb
107 total
And now we send the output of this pipe, through another pipe, to head
, so that the full pipeline becomes:
Input:
$ wc -l *.pdb | sort -n | head -n 1
Output:
9 methane.pdb
The redirection and pipes used in the last few commands are illustrated below:
Exercise: pipes
In our current directory, we want to find the 3 files which have the least number of lines. Which command listed below would work?
1. `wc -l * sort -n head -n 3`
2. `wc -l * | sort -n | head -n 1-3`
3. `wc -l * | head -n 3 | sort -n`
4. `wc -l * | sort -n | head -n 3`
Option 4 is the solution.
The pipe character |
is used to connect the output from one command to
the input of another.
>
is used to redirect standard output to a file.
Try it in the data-shell/molecules
directory!
The idea of linking programs together is why Unix is so successful. Instead of creating enormous programs that do many different things, Unix programmers focus on creating lots of simple tools that each do one job well, and work well with each other. This programming model is called “pipes and filters”.
We’ve already seen pipes; a filter is a program like wc
or sort
that transforms a stream of input into a stream of output. Most Unix tools operate similarly: unless told to do otherwise, they read from standard input, do
something with what they’ve read, and write to standard output.
Any program reading and writing lines of text through standard input and output can be combined with other programs similarly. You can and should write your programs this way so that you and other people can put those programs into pipes.
Exercise: Pipe Reading Comprehension
A file called animals.txt
(in the data-shell/data
folder) contains the following data:
2012-11-05,deer
2012-11-05,rabbit
2012-11-05,raccoon
2012-11-06,rabbit
2012-11-06,deer
2012-11-06,fox
2012-11-07,rabbit
2012-11-07,bear
What text passes through each of the pipes and the final redirect in the pipeline below?
$ cat animals.txt | head -n 5 | tail -n 3 | sort -r > final.txt
Hint: build the pipeline up one command at a time to test your understanding
The ‘head’ command extracts the first 5 lines from ‘animals.txt’.
Then, the last 3 lines are extracted from the previous 5 by using the ‘tail’ command.
With the ‘sort -r’ command those 3 lines are sorted in reverse order and finally, the output is redirected to a file ‘final.txt’.
The content of this file can be checked by executing cat final.txt
.
The file should contain the following lines:
2012-11-06,rabbit
2012-11-06,deer
2012-11-05,raccoon
Exercise: More piping
For the file animals.txt
from the previous exercise, consider the following command:
$ cut -d , -f 2 animals.txt
The cut
command removes or “cut out” sections of each line in a file. It uses the optional -d
flag to set the delimiter, is a character that is used to separate each line of text into columns. By default, the delimiter is Tab. Meaning cut
automatically assumes values in different columns is separated by a tab. The -f
flag specifies the field (column) to cut out.
The command above uses the -d
option to split each line by comma, and the -f
option
to print the second field in each line, to give the following output:
deer
rabbit
raccoon
rabbit
deer
fox
rabbit
bear
The uniq
command filters out adjacent matching lines in a file.
How could you extend this pipeline (using uniq
and another command) to find out what animals the file contains (without any duplicates in their names)?
$ cut -d , -f 2 animals.txt | sort | uniq
Exercise: animals.txt
The file animals.txt
contains 8 lines of data formatted as follows:
2012-11-05,deer
2012-11-05,rabbit
2012-11-05,raccoon
2012-11-06,rabbit
2012-11-06,deer
2012-11-06,fox
2012-11-07,rabbit
2012-11-07,bear
The uniq
command has a -c
option which gives a count of the number of times a line occurs in its input. Assuming your current directory is data-shell/data/
, what command would you use to produce a table that shows the total count of each type of animal in the file?
sort animals.txt | uniq -c
sort -t, -k2,2 animals.txt | uniq -c
cut -d, -f 2 animals.txt | uniq -c
cut -d, -f 2 animals.txt | sort | uniq -c
cut -d, -f 2 animals.txt | sort | uniq -c | wc -l
Option 4. is the correct answer.
If you have difficulty understanding why, try running the commands, or sub-sections of the pipelines (make sure you are in the ‘data-shell/data’ directory).
Nelle has run her samples through the assay machines
and created 17 files in the north-pacific-gyre/2012-07-03
directory described earlier.
As a quick sanity check, starting from her home directory, Nelle types:
Input:
$ cd north-pacific-gyre/2012-07-03
$ wc -l *.txt
The output is 18 lines that look like this:
Output:
300 NENE01729A.txt
300 NENE01729B.txt
300 NENE01736A.txt
300 NENE01751A.txt
300 NENE01751B.txt
300 NENE01812A.txt
Now she types this:
Input:
$ wc -l *.txt | sort -n | head -n 5
Output:
240 NENE02018B.txt
300 NENE01729A.txt
300 NENE01729B.txt
300 NENE01736A.txt
300 NENE01751A.txt
Whoops: one of the files is 60 lines shorter than the others. When she goes back and checks it, she sees that she did that assay at 8:00 on a Monday morning — someone was probably in using the machine on the weekend, and she forgot to reset it. Before re-running that sample, she checks to see if any files have too much data:
Input:
$ wc -l *.txt | sort -n | tail -n 5
Output:
300 NENE02040B.txt
300 NENE02040Z.txt
300 NENE02043A.txt
300 NENE02043B.txt
5040 total
Those numbers look good — but what’s that ‘Z’ doing there in the third-to-last line? All of her samples should be marked ‘A’ or ‘B’; by convention, her lab uses ‘Z’ to indicate samples with missing information. To find others like it, she does this:
Input:
$ ls *Z.txt
Output:
NENE01971Z.txt NENE02040Z.txt
When checking the log on her laptop, there’s no depth recorded for two samples. Since it’s too late to get the information now, she decides to exclude those files from her analysis. Rather than deleting them using rm
, she might want to so some analysis later where depth is irrelevant so she’ll be careful and use a wildcard expression *[AB].txt
.
As always, the *
matches any number of characters; the expression [AB]
matches either an ‘A’ or a ‘B’, so this matches all the valid data files she has.
Exercise: Removing Unneeded Files
Imagine you want to clear out your processed data files, keeping only the raw files and the processing script to save space. Raw files have names ending in .dat
, while processed files end in .txt
. Which of the following options will remove only the processed data files, leaving the rest intact?
rm ?.txt
rm *.txt
rm * .txt
rm *.*
Bio Break!
Let’s take a brief break to stretch before moving on to the next page. See you in a few minutes.