Overview
Questions
Objectives
Keypoints
for
loop repeats commands once for every thing in a list.for
loop needs a variable to refer to the thing it is currently operating on.$name
to expand a variable (i.e., get its value). ${name}
can also be used.Ctrl*R
to search through the previously entered commands.history
to display recent commands, and !number
to repeat a command by number.Loops are a programming construct which allow us to repeat a command or set of commands for each item in a list. As such they are key to productivity improvements through automation. Similar to wildcards and tab completion, using loops also reduces the amount of typing required (and hence reduces the number of typing mistakes).
Suppose we have several hundred genome data files named basilisk.dat
, unicorn.dat
, and so on.
For this example,
we’ll use the creatures
directory which only has two example files,
but the principles can be applied to many many more files at once.
We would like to print out the classification for each species, which is given on the second line of the file.
For each file, we would need to execute the command head -n 2
and pipe this to tail -n 1
.
We’ll use a loop to solve this problem, but first let’s look at the general form of a loop:
For Loops Explained
First:
for thing in list_of_things
do
operation_using $thing # Indentation within the loop is not required, but aids legibility
done
We can apply this to our example:
$ for filename in basilisk.dat unicorn.dat
do
head -n 2 $filename | tail -n 1
done
Output:
CLASSIFICATION: basiliscus vulgaris
CLASSIFICATION: equus monoceros
Follow the Prompt
The shell prompt changes from $
to >
and back again as we were
typing in our loop. The second prompt, >
, is different to remind
us that we haven’t finished typing a complete command yet. A semicolon, ;
,
can be used to separate two commands written on a single line.
When the shell sees the keyword for
,
it knows to repeat a command (or group of commands) once for each item in a list.
Each time the loop runs (called an iteration), an item in the list is assigned in sequence to the variable, and the commands inside the loop are executed, before moving on to the next item in the list.
Inside the loop,
we call for the variable’s value by putting $
in front of it.
The $
tells the shell interpreter to treat
the variable as a variable name and substitute its value in its place,
rather than treat it as text or an external command.
In this example, the list is two filenames: basilisk.dat
and unicorn.dat
.
Each time the loop iterates, it will assign a file name to the variable filename
and run the head
command.
The first time through the loop,
$filename
is basilisk.dat
.
The interpreter runs the command head
on basilisk.dat
,
and then prints the
first three lines of basilisk.dat
.
For the second iteration, $filename
becomes
unicorn.dat
. This time, the shell runs head
on unicorn.dat
and prints the first three lines of unicorn.dat
.
Since the list was only two items, the shell exits the for
loop.
Same Symbols, Different Meanings
Here we see >
being used a shell prompt, whereas >
is also
used to redirect output.
Similarly, $
is used as a shell prompt, but, as we saw earlier,
it is also used to ask the shell to get the value of a variable.
If the shell prints `` or $
then it expects you to type something,
and the symbol is a prompt.
If you type `` or $
yourself, it is an instruction from you that
the shell should redirect output or get the value of a variable.
When using variables it is also
possible to put the names into curly braces to clearly delimit the variable
name: $filename
is equivalent to ${filename}
, but is different from
${file}name
. You may find this notation in other people’s programs.
We have called the variable in this loop filename
in order to make its purpose clearer to human readers.
The shell itself doesn’t care what the variable is called;
if we wrote this loop as:
$ for x in basilisk.dat unicorn.dat
do
head -n 2 $x | tail -n 1
done
or:
$ for temperature in basilisk.dat unicorn.dat
do
head -n 2 $temperature | tail -n 1
done
it would work exactly the same way.
Don’t do this.
Programs are only useful if people can understand them,
so meaningless names (like x
) or misleading names (like temperature
)
increase the odds that the program won’t do what its readers think it does.
Exercise: Variables in Loops
This exercise refers to the data-shell/molecules
directory.
ls
gives the following output:
cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
What is the output of the following code?
Input:
$ for datafile in *.pdb
do
ls *.pdb
done
What is the output when this code is executed?
The code gives the same output on each iteration through the loop.
Bash expands the wildcard ‘* .pdb’ within the loop body (as well as before the loop starts) to match all files ending in ‘.pdb’ and then lists them using ‘ls’. The expanded loop would look like this:
$ for datafile in cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
do
ls cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
done
Output:
cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
Exercise: Loops
What would be the output of running the following loop in the data-shell/molecules
directory?
$ for filename in c*
do
ls $filename
done
cubane.pdb
, octane.pdb
and pentane.pdb
are listed.cubane.pdb
is listed.4 is the correct answer. ‘ * ‘ matches zero or more characters, so any file name starting with the letter c, followed by zero or more other characters will be matched.
Exercise: Another loop
How would the output differ from using this command instead?
$ for filename in *c*
do
ls $filename
done
cubane.pdb
and octane.pdb
will be listed.octane.pdb
will be listed.4 is the correct answer. ‘ * ‘ matches zero or more characters, so a file name with zero or more characters before a letter c and zero or more characters after the letter c will be matched.
</div>
Exercise: Loops, loops, loops
Also in the data-shell/molecules
directory, what would be the output of the following loop?
for datafile in *.pdb
do
cat $datafile > all.pdb
done
cubane.pdb
, ethane.pdb
, methane.pdb
, octane.pdb
, and
pentane.pdb
would be concatenated and saved to a file called all.pdb
.ethane.pdb
will be saved to a file called all.pdb
.cubane.pdb
, ethane.pdb
, methane.pdb
, octane.pdb
, pentane.pdb
and propane.pdb
would be concatenated and saved to a file called all.pdb
.cubane.pdb
, ethane.pdb
, methane.pdb
, octane.pdb
, pentane.pdb
and propane.pdb
would be printed to the screen and saved to a file called all.pdb
.>
appends to a file, rather than overwriting it with the redirected
output from a command.
Given the output from the cat
command has been redirected, nothing is printed to the screen.NOTE: If you do NOT add ‘>’, then each $datafile
will be overwritten as the next file in *.pdb
is added to all.pdb
. The finished all.pdb
will only contain the contents of the last file in *.pdb
.
Let’s continue with our example in the data-shell/creatures
directory.
Here’s a slightly more complicated loop:
$ for filename in *.dat
do
echo $filename
head -n 100 $filename | tail -n 20
done
The shell starts by expanding *.dat
to create the list of files it will process.
The loop body
then executes two commands for each of those files.
The first, echo
, just prints its command-line arguments to standard output.
For example:
$ echo hello there
prints:
hello there
In this case,
since the shell expands $filename
to be the name of a file,
echo $filename
just prints the name of the file.
Note that we can’t write this as:
$ for filename in *.dat
do
$filename
head -n 100 $filename | tail -n 20
done
because then the first time through the loop,
when $filename
expanded to basilisk.dat
, the shell would try to run basilisk.dat
as a program.
Finally,
the head
and tail
combination selects lines 81-100
from whatever file is being processed
(assuming the file has at least 100 lines).
Spaces are used to separate the elements of the list that we are going to loop over. If one of those elements contains a space character, we need to surround it with quotes, and do the same thing to our loop variable. Suppose our data files are named:
Output:
red dragon.dat
purple unicorn.dat
To loop over these files, we would need to add double quotes like so:
Input:
$ for filename in "red dragon.dat" "purple unicorn.dat"
do
head -n 100 "$filename" | tail -n 20
done
It is simpler just to avoid using spaces (or other special characters) in filenames.
The files above don’t exist, so if we run the above code, the head
command will be unable
to find them, however the error message returned will show the name of the files it is
expecting:
Output:
head: cannot open ‘red dragon.dat’ for reading: No such file or directory
head: cannot open ‘purple unicorn.dat’ for reading: No such file or directory
Try removing the quotes around $filename
in the loop above to see the effect of the quote
marks on spaces. Note that we get a result from the loop command for unicorn.dat when we run this code in the creatures
directory:
Output:
head: cannot open ‘red’ for reading: No such file or directory
head: cannot open ‘dragon.dat’ for reading: No such file or directory
head: cannot open ‘purple’ for reading: No such file or directory
CGGTACCGAA
AAGGGTCGCG
CAAGTGTTCC
We would like to modify each of the files in data-shell/creatures
, but also save a version
of the original files, naming the copies original-basilisk.dat
and original-unicorn.dat
.
We can’t use:
$ cp *.dat original-*.dat
because that would expand to:
$ cp basilisk.dat unicorn.dat original-*.dat
This wouldn’t back up our files, instead we get an error:
Output:
cp: target 'original-*.dat' is not a directory
This problem arises when cp
receives more than two inputs. When this happens, it
expects the last input to be a directory where it can copy all the files it was passed.
Since there is no directory named original-*.dat
in the creatures
directory we get an
error.
Instead, we can use a loop:
Output:
$ for filename in *.dat
do
cp $filename original-$filename
done
This loop runs the cp
command once for each filename.
The first time,
when $filename
expands to basilisk.dat
,
the shell executes:
cp basilisk.dat original-basilisk.dat
The second time, the command is:
cp unicorn.dat original-unicorn.dat
Since the cp
command does not normally produce any output, it’s hard to check
that the loop is doing the correct thing.
However, we learned earlier how to print strings using echo
, and we can modify the loop
to use echo
to print our commands without actually executing them.
As such we can check what commands would be run in the unmodified loop.
The following diagram
shows what happens when the modified loop is executed, and demonstrates how the
judicious use of echo
is a good debugging technique.
Nelle is now ready to process her data files using goostats
— a shell script written by her supervisor.
This calculates some statistics from a protein sample file, and takes two arguments:
Since she’s still learning how to use the shell, she decides to build up the required commands in stages. Her first step is to make sure that she can select the right input files — remember, these are ones whose names end in ‘A’ or ‘B’, rather than ‘Z’. Starting from her home directory, Nelle types:
Input:
$ cd north-pacific-gyre/2012-07-03
$ for datafile in NENE*[AB].txt
do
echo $datafile
done
Output:
NENE01729A.txt
NENE01729B.txt
NENE01736A.txt
...
NENE02043A.txt
NENE02043B.txt
Her next step is to decide
what to call the files that the goostats
analysis program will create.
Prefixing each input file’s name with “stats” seems simple,
so she modifies her loop to do that:
Input:
$ for datafile in NENE*[AB].txt
do
echo $datafile stats-$datafile
done
Output:
NENE01729A.txt stats-NENE01729A.txt
NENE01729B.txt stats-NENE01729B.txt
NENE01736A.txt stats-NENE01736A.txt
...
NENE02043A.txt stats-NENE02043A.txt
NENE02043B.txt stats-NENE02043B.txt
She hasn’t actually run goostats
yet,
but now she’s sure she can select the right files and generate the right output filenames.
Typing in commands over and over again is becoming tedious, though, and Nelle is worried about making mistakes, so instead of re-entering her loop, she presses the up arrow. In response, the shell redisplays the whole loop on one line (using semi-colons to separate the pieces):
$ for datafile in NENE*[AB].txt; do echo $datafile stats-$datafile; done
Using the left arrow key,
Nelle backs up and changes the command echo
to bash goostats
:
$ for datafile in NENE*[AB].txt; do bash goostats $datafile stats-$datafile; done
When she presses Enter,
the shell runs the modified command.
However, nothing appears to happen — there is no output.
After a moment, Nelle realizes that since her script doesn’t print anything to the screen any longer,
she has no idea whether it is running, much less how quickly.
She kills the running command by typing Ctrl-C
,
uses up-arrow to repeat the command,
and edits it to read:
$ for datafile in NENE*[AB].txt; do echo $datafile; bash goostats $datafile stats-$datafile; done
Note: Beginning and End
We can move to the beginning of a line in the shell by typing Ctrl-a
and to the end using Ctrl-e
.
When she runs her program now, it produces one line of output every five seconds or so:
Output:
NENE01729A.txt
NENE01729B.txt
NENE01736A.txt
...
1518 times 5 seconds,
divided by 60,
tells her that her script will take about two hours to run.
As a final check,
she opens another terminal window,
goes into north-pacific-gyre/2012-07-03
,
and uses cat stats-NENE01729B.txt
to examine one of the output files.
It looks good,
so she decides to get some coffee and catch up on her reading.
Note: Those Who Know History Can Choose to Repeat It
Another way to repeat previous work is to use the history
command to
get a list of the last few hundred commands that have been executed, and
then to use !123
(where “123” is replaced by the command number) to
repeat one of those commands. For example, if Nelle types this:
Input:
$ history | tail -n 5
Output:
456 ls -l NENE0*.txt
457 rm stats-NENE01729B.txt.txt
458 bash goostats NENE01729B.txt stats-NENE01729B.txt
459 ls -l NENE0*.txt
460 history
then she can re-run goostats
on NENE01729B.txt
simply by typing !458
There are a number of other shortcut commands for getting at the history.
Ctrl-R
enters a history search mode “reverse-i-search” and finds the
most recent command in your history that matches the text you enter next.
Press Ctrl-R
one or more additional times to search for earlier matches.
!!
retrieves the immediately preceding command
(you may or may not find this more convenient than using the up-arrow)
*!$
retrieves the last word of the last command.
That’s useful more often than you might expect: after
bash goostats NENE01729B.txt stats-NENE01729B.txt
, you can type
less !$
to look at the file stats-NENE01729B.txt
, which is
quicker than doing up-arrow and editing the command-line.
A loop is a way to do many things at once — or to make many mistakes at
once if it does the wrong thing. One way to check what a loop would do
is to echo
the commands it would run instead of actually running them.
Suppose we want to preview the commands the following loop will execute without actually running those commands:
$ for file in *.pdb
do
analyze $file analyzed-$file
done
Exercise: loop vs loop
What is the difference between the two loops below, and which one would we want to run?
Version 1:
$ for file in *.pdb
do
analyze $file analyzed-$file
done
Version 2:
$ for file in *.pdb
do
echo "analyze $file analyzed-$file"
done
The second version is the one we want to run. This prints to screen everything enclosed in the quote marks, expanding the loop variable name because we have prefixed it with a dollar sign.
The first version redirects the output from the command ‘echo analyze $file’ to a file, ‘analyzed-$file’. A series of files is generated: ‘analyzedcubane.pdb’, ‘analyzed-ethane.pdb’ etc.
Try both versions for yourself to see the output! Be sure to open the ‘analyzed- * .pdb’ files to view their contents.
Exercise: Nested Loops
Suppose we want to set up up a directory structure to organize some experiments measuring reaction rate constants with different compounds and different temperatures. What would be the result of the following code:
$ for species in cubane ethane methane
do
for temperature in 25 30 37 40
do
mkdir $species-$temperature
done
done
We have a nested loop, i.e. contained within another loop, so for each species in the outer loop, the inner loop (the nested loop) iterates over the list of temperatures, and creates a new directory for each combination.
Try running the code for yourself to see which directories are created!